I’ve been inspired to try a new style for writing up my latest library conference experience by my colleague Jess Haigh and her brilliant LILAC write up. So credit for the more structured format for this reflective piece goes to Jess!
I attended Meeting the Reading List Challenge at Loughborough University, April 5th-6th 2016. I presented at the event, alongside Alison Sharman, about the strategies for staff engagement with reading lists at the University of Huddersfield. Part of the presentation was specifically focused on my current project based role at the University, which is all about Business School reading lists. As my full time job is all about reading lists, I was particularly excited about this event as an opportunity to share my own experiences and see if I could find inspiration from others to try new things.
- Reading List versus Resource List – What do we call them?
- Intellectual Property and Open Data
- Staff and Student Engagement
What was the best thing I learned? There were lots of brilliant ideas shared about getting staff and students engaged with reading lists. My talk on staff engagement was complemented by the following presentations which also dealt largely with issues of staff engagement:
- If at first you don’t succeed… by Sarah Rayner and Olivia Walsby (University of Manchester)
- Co-ordinating complexity by Sara Hafeez (University of Westminster)
Both these presentations were very reassuring. I don’t feel alone in my struggles! Manchester focused on sharing their failings which was refreshingly honest and very useful. Sara from Westminster had some great stories to tell about trying to co-ordinate reading lists in her organisation. The presentations left me feeling inspired, with new ideas of things to try out.
What was the most though provoking idea? Open data proved to be an interesting discussion. We were asked to think about how reading list data could be useful for the library, the academic faculty, and the institution. Also about how useful reading list data from other institutions could be and what barriers there are for sharing this? It is this second part that led to discussions about the intellectual property surround reading lists came into this debate. If we start to share reading list content as open data then does it cause intellectual property problems and issues for universities in a competitive educational market?
What do I want to learn more about? I’m going to learn more about open data because Martin Hamilton’s talk highlighted that I don’t know very much about this at all.
- Top down policy v academic driven processes
- Reading list best practice
- Engagement again!
What was the best thing I learned? I surprised myself by enjoying the two vendor presentations. A lot of people left in the break before these, and I was tempted, as we have our own in-house system. I’m glad I stayed as it was very interesting to see what commercial systems are currently on offer and learn about their features.
What was the most inspirational idea? The turning your reading list into a conversation workshop from Sheffield Hallam. We did a group activity to build an engaging and interactive reading list with the help of big paper, pens, glue and lots of bits of paper with example reading list items on. Could this be used to teach academics about best practice for creating reading lists? It might work at a department away day for example. To make it effective I’d need to team up with someone with expertise in teaching to make sure pedagogical issues could be properly included.
What do I want to learn more about? Library systems. I found all the discussions surrounding the technical aspects of library systems interesting and the processes involved in the procurement of a new system. The presentation from Kingston about being a development partner with Leganto was fascinating. I can see myself enjoying working in this area of librarianship so I’m going to start building my knowledge of this area.